Infinite Loss

 Infinite Loss

Wallace David Foster Marion Ettlinger


David Foster Wallace, whose monumental novel “Infinite Jest” — with 1,079 pages of text, including 96 pages of small print footnotes (some of which were literary gems in themselves) — and whose extraordinary essay collections (including “Consider the Lobster,” published in 2006) made him perhaps the most gifted writer of his generation, committed suicide Friday night, at age 46.


 


Consider the Lobster” included a title essay that cannot be read without re-defining one’s view of the moral status and suffering of lower forms of life, as well as other insightful essays on subjects as diverse as talk radio, the writers of dictionaries, and Kafka’s humor (an essay that is simultaneously funny and frightening and bears re-reading in light of Wallace’s taking of his own life).


 


Just three years ago, Wallace gave the commencement address at
Kenyon

College
.  Here is an excerpt from it, which will perhaps give a sense of the infinite sadness of his death:


Here is just one example of the total wrongness of something I tend to be automatically sure of:  everything in my own immediate experience supports my deep belief that I am the absolute center of the universe; the realist, most vivid and important person in existence. 


We rarely think about this sort of natural, basic self-centeredness because it’s so socially repulsive.  But it’s pretty much the same for all of us.  It is our default setting, hard-wired into our boards at birth. 


Think about it:  there is no experience you have had that you are not the absolute center of.  The world as you experience it is there in front of YOU or behind YOU, to the left or right of YOU, on YOUR TV or YOUR monitor.  And so on.  Other people’s thoughts and feelings have to be communicated to you somehow, but your own are so immediate, urgent, real.


Please don’t worry that I’m getting ready to lecture you about compassion or other-directedness or all the so-called virtues.  This is not a matter of virtue. 


It’s a matter of my choosing to do the work of somehow altering or getting free of my natural, hard-wired default setting which is to be deeply and literally self-centered and to see and interpret everything through this lens of self.  People who can adjust their natural default setting this way are often described as being “well-adjusted”, which I suggest to you is not an accidental term. . . .


And I submit that this is what the real, no bullshit value of your liberal arts education is supposed to be about:  how to keep from going through your comfortable, prosperous, respectable adult life dead, unconscious, a slave to your head and to your natural default setting of being uniquely, completely, imperially alone day in and day out. 


That may sound like hyperbole, or abstract nonsense.  Let’s get concrete.  The plain fact is that you graduating seniors do not yet have any clue what “day in day out” really means.  There happen to be whole, large parts of adult American life that nobody talks about in commencement speeches.  One such part involves boredom, routine, and petty frustration.  The parents and older folks here will know all too well what I’m talking about.


By way of example, let’s say it’s an average adult day, and you get up in the morning, go to your challenging, white-collar, college-graduate job, and you work hard for eight or ten hours, and at the end of the day you’re tired and somewhat stressed and all you want is to go home and have a good supper and maybe unwind for an hour, and then hit the sack early because, of course, you have to get up the next day and do it all again.


But then you remember there’s no food at home. . . . so now after work you have to get in your car and drive to the supermarket. . . . and when you finally get there, the supermarket is very crowded, because of course it’s the time of day when all the other people with jobs also try to squeeze in some grocery shopping. . . .


[E]ventually you get all your supper supplies, except now it turns out there aren’t enough check-out lanes open even though it’s the end-of-the-day rush.  So the checkout line is incredibly long, which is stupid and infuriating.  But you can’t take your frustration out on the frantic lady working the register, who is overworked at a job whose daily tedium and meaninglessness surpasses the imagination of any of us here at a prestigious college. . . .


The point is that petty, frustrating crap like this is exactly where the work of choosing is gonna come in.  Because the traffic jams and crowded aisles and long checkout lines give me time to think, and if I don’t make a conscious decision about how to think and what to pay attention to, I’m gonna be pissed and miserable every time I have to shop.  Because my natural default setting is the certainty that situations like this are really all about me. About MY hungriness and MY fatigue and MY desire to just get home, and it’s going to seem for all the world like everybody else is just in my way.


And who are all these people in my way? And look at how repulsive most of them are, and how stupid and cow-like and dead-eyed and nonhuman they seem in the checkout line, or at how annoying and rude it is that people are talking loudly on cell phones in the middle of the line. . . .


If I choose to think this way in a store and on the freeway, fine.  Lots of us do. Except thinking this way tends to be so easy and automatic that it doesn’t have to be a choice.  It is my natural default setting.  It’s the automatic way that I experience the boring, frustrating, crowded parts of adult life when I’m operating on the automatic, unconscious belief that I am the center of the world . . . .


Or I can choose to force myself to consider the likelihood that everyone else in the supermarket’s checkout line is just as bored and frustrated as I am, and that some of these people probably have harder, more tedious and painful lives than I do.


Again, please don’t think that I’m giving you moral advice, or that I’m saying you are supposed to think this way, or that anyone expects you to just automatically do it.  Because it’s hard.  It takes will and effort, and if you are like me, some days you won’t be able to do it, or you just flat out won’t want to.


But most days, if you’re aware enough to give yourself a choice, you can choose to look differently at this fat, dead-eyed, over-made-up lady who just screamed at her kid in the checkout line.  Maybe she’s not usually like this.  Maybe she’s been up three straight nights holding the hand of a husband who is dying of bone cancer. . . If you’re automatically sure that you know what reality is, and you are operating on your default setting, then you, like me, probably won’t consider possibilities that aren’t annoying and miserable.


But if you really learn how to pay attention, then you will know there are other options.  It will actually be within your power to experience a crowded, hot, slow, consumer-hell type situation as not only meaningful, but sacred, on fire with the same force that made the stars:  love, fellowship, the mystical oneness of all things deep down.


Not that that mystical stuff is necessarily true.  The only thing that’s capital-T True is that you get to decide how you’re gonna try to see it.  This, I submit, is the freedom of a real education, of learning how to be well-adjusted.  You get to consciously decide what has meaning and what doesn’t.  You get to decide what to worship. . . .


That is real freedom.  That is being educated, and understanding how to think.  The alternative is unconsciousness, the default setting, the rat race, the constant gnawing sense of having had, and lost, some infinite thing.


A selection of comments and thoughts on his life and death are here.

It is an infinite loss for his wife and family, his friends and colleagues and students, and for us that he was unable to choose life.

Categories : Articles